← All cases

[2017] NSWSC 1586

NRMA Insurance v State Insurance Regulatory Authority (Ruo Shan Wu)

(1) Summons dated 24 August 2016 dismissed. (2) Plaintiff to pay defendants’ costs.

Catchwords

ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – judicial review – whether Proper Officer erred in refusing a referral to a review panel under Motor Accidents Compensation Act 1999 (NSW), s 63 – whether Proper Officer erred in finding that there was no error of a material respect concerning assessment “on the papers” for claimants outside Australia – held no error

Cases cited

  • Insurance Australia Ltd t/a NRMA Insurance v State Insurance Regulatory Authority[2017] NSWSC 1566

Legislation cited

  • Supreme Court Act 1970

Judgment

  1. [1]

    On 24 August 2016, the plaintiff, Insurance Australia Ltd t/as NRMA Insurance, brought proceedings by way of Summons against the first defendant, the State Insurance Regulatory Authority, and the second defendant, Mrs Ruo Shan Wu.

  2. [2]

    These proceedings were brought at the same time as, and were in substance the same as, those proceedings brought against other members of the second defendant’s family - Mr Kun Fen Chen, her husband, and Ms Yan Fei Chen, their daughter.

  3. [3]

    The legal issues and submissions in each of the three proceedings were the same.

  4. [4]

    I have today delivered judgment in the proceedings involving the second defendant’s husband: Insurance Australia Ltd t/as NRMA Insurance v State Insurance Regulatory Agency [2017] NSWSC 1566.

  5. [5]

    Because of the identity of issues, it follows that for the same reasons which I have there expressed, I would also dismiss these proceedings.

Orders

  1. [6]

    I make the following orders:

    1. (1)

      Summons dated 24 August 2016 dismissed.

    2. (2)

      Plaintiff to pay defendants’ costs.

Unofficial copy. Source: NSW Caselaw. Refer to the official version for authoritative text.