[2018] NSWCCA 119
Goldberg v R (No 2)
1. Set aside order 3 made on 28 May 2018 and make the following order: Quash the sentence imposed by Blackmore DCJ on 9 March 2017 and, in lieu thereof, impose an aggregate sentence of imprisonment for 8 years and 6 months with a non-parole period of 6 years and 4 months commencing on 5 November 2015 and expiring on 4 March 2022 with a balance of term of 2 years and 2 months expiring on 4 May 2024.
Catchwords
PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – slip rule – variation of orders
Cases cited
- Goldberg v R[2018] NSWCCA 99
Legislation cited
- Criminal Appeal Rules (NSW), § 50C(3)
Judgment
- [1]
THE COURT: On 28 May 2018, in the disposition of an appeal by the applicant against the severity of his sentence (Goldberg v R [2018] NSWCCA 99), the Court made the following orders:
- (1)
Leave to appeal granted.
- (2)
The appeal is allowed.
- (3)
Quash the sentence imposed by Blackmore DCJ on 9 March 2017 and, in lieu thereof, impose an aggregate sentence of imprisonment for 8 years and 6 months with a non-parole period of 6 years and 4 months commencing on 5 November 2015 and expiring on 4 March 2022 with a balance of term of 2 years and 1 month expiring on 4 April 2024.
- (1)
- [2]
On 29 May 2018 the Registrar of the Court of Criminal Appeal alerted the Court (comprised of Hoeben CJ at CL, White JA and Fullerton J) to a potential error in order 3 above in that either the total term should have been appointed as 8 years and 5 months to conform with a balance of term of 2 years and 1 month after specification of a non-parole period of 6 years and 4 months, or on the total term of 8 years and 6 months with a non-parole period of 6 years and 4 months, the balance of term has been wrongly specified as 2 years and 1 month expiring on 4 April 2024, when it should have been specified as 2 years and 2 months, expiring on 4 May 2024.
- [3]
Having regard to [127] of the judgment and the clear intention to impose an aggregate sentence of 8 years and 6 months comprised of a non-parole period of 6 years and 4 months, there is an arithmetical error in the calculation of the balance of term. Instead of appointing the balance of term of 2 years and 2 months, a term of 2 years and 1 month has been specified; an error which has been translated, uncorrected, into the orders of the Court.
- [4]
In exercise of the power in s 50C(3) of the Criminal Appeal Rules (NSW), the Court makes the following orders:
- (1)
Set aside order 3 made on 28 May 2018 and make the following order.
- (1)