Cases and authorities
Search and browse the full text of NSW Supreme Court judgments ingested into BriefBridge. Click a result to read the judgment, or ask a research question in chat.
Marsden v Amalgamated Television Services Pty Limited
[2000] NSWSC 280Admissibility - relevance - qualified privilege - common law - s22 Defamation Act - Lange defendant - matter complained - imputations - information - belief in truths - T5128.
Virtual Circuits P/L v Sanderson Edgecliff P/L
[2000] NSWSC 251Construction of a Lease - Validity of Notice of Termination pursuant to Redevelopment Clause - Entitlement to Exercise Option.
Evans -v- DPP
[2000] NSWSC 391s.48E application - special reasons
Khalifeh & Anor v RSPCA & Ors
[2000] NSWSC 247Regina -v- Levy
[2000] NSWSC 355Life sentence - determination of minimim and additional terms - Sentencing Act 1989 - s.13A
Regina v Kovacs
[2000] NSWCCA 74R v QUANSAH
[2000] NSWCCA 64Criminal Law - sentencing - importation of cocaine
Regina v AG - Regina v RJM
[2000] NSWCCA 86Regina v GLC
[2000] NSWCCA 90Criminal law - application for leave to appeal against interlocutory order refusing an application for separate trials - Crown seeking to rely upon tendency and coincidence evidence under ss97 and 98 of the Evidence Act 1995 - consideration of the appropriate procedure where question of possible concoction may arise between complainants in charges of sexual misconduct involving more than one complainant - such questions should be resolved in the District Court under Rule 11 of Part 53 - Criminal Procedure Rules.
R v ROBINSON
[2000] NSWCCA 59Criminal Law - whether verdicts of guilty consistent with verdicts of acquittal on other counts - whether verdicts 'merciful' - whether verdicts compromised - whether verdicts reasonable
State of New South Wales v Buckland & Ors; Katena Pty Ltd & Ors v Buckland & Ors
[2000] NSWCA 72NEGLIGENCE - harvester brought from area where Parthenium weed prevalent - approved to enter NSW by government inspector - used on NSW farm - paddock developed Parthenium weed infestation - whether from use of harvester - whether negligence in approving entry of harvester into NSW - whether negligence in use of harvester - whether negligence causally related to infestation - finding that weed infestation caused by use of harvester upheld - negligence in approving entry of harvester into NSW not causally related to weed infestation - (by majority) negligence in use of harvester was conjectural and not proved - distinction between conjecture and inference and whether facts permitted inference of causally related negligence considered. D
REPATRIATION COMMISSION v VIETNAM VETERANS' ASSOCIATION OF AUSTRALIA NSW BRANCH INC. & ORS
[2000] NSWCA 65ADMINISTRATIVE LAW - veterans’ pensions - Statements of Principle - formulation by the Repatriation Medical Authority - Veterans’ Entitlements Act 1986 (Cth), s196B - ADMINISTRATIVE LAW - veterans’ pensions - Statements of Principle - review by the Specialist Medical Review Council - Veterans’ Entitlements Act 1986 (Cth), s196W and s196Y - ADMINISTRATIVE LAW - veterans’ pensions - "available" - Veterans’ Entitlements Act 1986 (Cth), s196W - ADMINISTRATIVE LAW - veterans’ pensions - "sound medical-scientific evidence", "meets the criteria" - Veterans’ Entitlements Act 1986 (Cth), s5AB(2) - ADMINISTRATIVE LAW - veterans’ pensions - "reasonable hypothesis" - "reasonable satisfaction" - Veterans’ Entitlements Act 1986 (Cth), s120(1), s120(3) and s120(4). - ADMINISTRATIVE LAW - procedural fairness - obligation to limit statutory review to matters raised in the application.
Baxter v Obacelo Pty Ltd & Anor
[2000] NSWCA 69JOINT TORTFEASORS - proceedings against both - settlement between plaintiffs and one defendant - judgment entered for settlement sum and settlement sum paid to plaintiffs - plaintiffs continue against other defendant - summary judgment application by the defendant - becomes decision of separate question - whether by force of s 5(1)(b) of the Law Reform (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1946 the plaintiffs could not recover from the defendant more than the judgment sum - no, because the restriction on recovery in the action did not apply where the tortfeasors were sued in the same proceedings - whether satisfaction of the judgment barred further proceedings against the defendant - no, because on facts the judgment for the settlement sum was not in full satisfaction of the plaintiffs' loss - whether settlement and payment of settlement sum barred further proceedings against the defendant - no, because on the facts the settlement sum was not in full satisfaction of the plaintiffs' loss - consideration of rule against double satisfaction and its application to a judgment sum. D
CURRABUBULA & PAOLA v STATE BANK NSW. CURRABUBULA v STATE BANK NSW
[2000] NSWSC 232Practice and Procedure - Costs - Taxation of Costs - 'Rule of Thumb' applicable when multiple defendants are variously successful and unsuccessful - Whether applicable to multiple plaintiffs variously successful and unsuccessful - Whether rule of thumb was properly applied in these proceedings - Whether rule of thumb excluded by the costs orders previously made. - Practice and Procedure - Jurisdiction of Court to correct errors in orders under the 'slip rule' - Principles governing the use of the slip rule - Whether slip rule may appropriately be employed in this case. - Practice and Procedure - Legal Profession Act 1987 - Appeal from 'decision' of a costs assessor - Whether appeal only permissible after determination of assessment - Differentiation between 'decision' and 'determination' of costs assessor - Purpose of provisions permitting for an appeal from a 'decision' of a costs assessor. - Practice and Procedure - Reckoning of time - principles governing the extension of time in which an appeal can be instituted. - Equity - Declaratory relief - Court's power to issue declaratory relief - Whether affected by the Legal Profession Act 1987 - Principles informing Court's discretion to issue declaratory relief - Relevance of alternative means of appeal.
Kingsman v Health Administration Corporation
[2000] NSWSC 136R v STRAHAN
[2000] NSWSC 537Criminal Law - sentencing - accessory after the fact of manslaughter
McGuid t/as ABS Gulf v Export Finance & Insurance
[2000] NSWSC 277Collins v Westpac
[2000] NSWSC 260Corporations Law. Application to set aside statutory demand due to a defect in the deman and affidavit. Reference in demand to a debt due under an agreement rather than a judgment obtained in respect of the debt. Held demand was a purported demand and no substantial injustice would result if it was not set aside. Summons dismissed.
GRAY (CONSTRUCTIONS) PTY LTD v HOGAN (No 2)
[2000] NSWCA 68Costs [ND]
MACKINNON v. THE PROPRIETORS STRATA PLAN NO. 14311
[2000] NSWCA 81COSTS - General rule - Costs follow the event - NEGLIGENCE - Duty of care - Occupier's liability - When duty arises - Extent of duty of care ND
Vinidex v Thiess
[2000] NSWCA 67APPORTIONMENT OF DAMAGES BETWEEN JOINT TORTFEASORS - LAW REFORM (MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS) ACT 1965 - Whether it was a proper exercise of discretion, in all the circumstances and having regard to the applicable principles, to hold each tortfeasor equally liable. Held that notwithstanding the caution which should attend interference with the exercise of the trial Judge's assessment that was not the proper apportionment and the Court of Appeal should re-assess the apportionment. Held that in lieu of equal amounts the appellant should pay 20 per cent and the respondent 80 per cent.
Regina v Nedjelko BIKIC
[2000] NSWCCA 106Hungry Jack's v Burger King (No 2)
[2000] NSWSC 241GIO Workers Compensation -v- CGU Insurance
[2000] NSWSC 243Practice and Procedure - application for stay or summary dismissal - utility of declaratory relief
Lowe v Lang
[2000] NSWSC 309EVIDENCE [228] - Witnesses - Refreshing memory - Generally - Documents used to revive memory - Memory revised before swearing affidavits read in evidence - Whether production required under Evidence Act 1995 (NSW) s 34 - Memory revived from part of privileged document - Rest of document not relevant to witness' testimony - Whether production of whole document should be required under s 34.
Re Estate Harriett Cassel
[2000] NSWSC 294Law Reform- Limited grants of administration for Famiily Provision Act purposes- Improvements needed - Succession [95]- Administration- Soley for purposes of a Family Provision matter- Considerations- Wills Probate & Administration Act, 1898, s 41A
Hemmes v Seven Network Limited
[2000] NSWSC 246Defamation - Interlocutory injunction
REGINA v WATKINS
[2000] NSWCCA 76CRIMINAL LAW - Miscarriage of justice - Verdict unreasonable and unsupported by evidence - Where complainant's evidence wrong in relation to when offences committed and where significant feature of occasion in which offences committe wrong - Where trial Judge directed jury to return same verdict on every count - No direction that each count could only relate to one event - Possibility of conviction for matter not charged
Palmer Bruyn & Parker Pty Ltd v Parsons
[2000] NSWCA 53Tort of injurious falsehood - improper motive - false, misleading, maliciously published material - disseminated by grapevine effect - natural and probable consequence of republication of false material - Patrick Nugawela v Reginald Crampton and Royal Australian College of General Practitioners (Supreme Court of NSW, Levine J, unreported, 31 January 1996) - no intent to injure without just cause or excuse - no actual damage or injury suffered by the plaintiff by reason of the malicious publication of false material - ND
Mercouris v Westfield Shopping Centre Management Company Pty Ltd
[2000] NSWCA 79NEGLIGENCE - slipping case - whether shopping centre had adequate system of cleaning and inspection (yes) - whether should have had different flooring material (no) - no question of principle. ND
Wereta v The Nominal Defendant
[2000] NSWSC 234North Sydney District Rugby League Football Club Limited & 1 Ors v David Hill & 3 Ors
[2000] NSWSC 249CORPORATIONS — Deed of Company Arrangement does not preclude election of board by members — Construction of regulations of constitution of Club re eligibility for election of Board.
Brennan v Baker
[2000] NSWCA 91Motor vehicle accident - liability
WFA v Hobart City Council
[2000] NSWCA 43Law of contract - arbitration clause - whether clause void - whether enforcing clause constituted breach of natural justice - abuse of process
Burns v Milne
[2000] NSWSC 351Family Provision. Application by a daughter. Provision made for daughter varied. No matter of principle.
Lowe v Lang
[2000] NSWSC 308EVIDENCE [228] - Witnesses - Refreshing memory - Generally - Documents used to revive memory - Whether documents sufficiently identified for production to be required under Evidence Act 1995 (NSW) s 34.
Gruber v Blake
[2000] NSWSC 226Add defendant - extend time for filing amended statement of claim - S 43(1) and s 52(4) MAA explanation - Part 33 r 8A SCR - Part 20 r 1 SCR - Part 20 r 4(5) SCR - Part 8 r 8 SCR - S75AO TPA
Lowe v Lang
[2000] NSWSC 307EVIDENCE [72], [75] - Facts excluded from proof - On grounds of privilege - Professional confidence - Legal profession - General principles - Evidence Act 1995 (NSW) - Privilege at common law - Waiver of privilege - Extent of disclosure required when party puts privileged material into evidence.
Principal Strategic Options v Coshott
[2000] NSWSC 310Contract - construction of put option clause - specific performance - uncertainty of option agreement.
Aust Yieh Stainless Pty Limited v Horans Steel Pty Limited
[2000] NSWSC 244CORPORATIONS — General solvency argued at winding up stage — No leave required under s459S of Corporations Law — Not in dispute that company had failed to set aside statutory demand but was solvent even if debt was paid in full — Registrar’s order declining to wind up confirmed.
Amalgamated Television Services Pty Limited v Marsden
[2000] NSWCA 63LEAVE TO APPEAL - interlocutory order - waiver of legal professional privilege - whether matter of practice and procedure - whether leave should be granted - proceedings out of ordinary - in circumstances, leave granted. In re the Will of Gilbert (1946) 46 SR(NSW) 318 referred to. LEGAL PROFESSIONAL PRIVILEGE - delivery of particulars said to be based on or in accordance with a statement - whether waiver of privilege - whether inconsistency between this and maintaining the confidentiality protected by the privilege - no waiver. Attorney-General for the Northern Territory v Maurice (1986) 161 CLR 475 and Mann v Carnell (1999) HCA66 applied. D
POMFRET & ORS v. CUMBERLAND & ANOR
[2000] NSWSC 229CONTRACT - Indemnity - decision on facts of alleged oral arrangements among individuals who were principals in group of companies and raised capital by (unequal) loans from principals and by security over assets of individuals for company borrowings.
REGINA v. SKINNER
[2000] NSWSC 303Criminal law - sentence - hinder police investigation - serious offence - stale crime - resident of Queensland - nil further offences
Switz Pty Ltd v Glowbind Pty Ltd
[2000] NSWSC 222Corporations - Winding up - Insolvency - Cash flow test - Whether can infer solvency from surplus of current assets over current liabilities - Whether is mere temporary illiquidity where debts could be paid by sale of assets.
Blasutto v Fantin; Estate of Maria Delfina Blasutto
[2000] NSWSC 258Succession [30]- Lost will- Presumptions- Uncertainty whether will last in possession of testatrix or solicitor.
Aoun v Clark
[2000] NSWSC 274Succession [55]- Will- Revocation- Instructions for new will by writing on old will- Statements by testator that he had no will- Revocation under s 18A Wills etc Act, 1898
Marsden v Amalgamated Television Services Pty Limited
[2000] NSWSC 238On defendant's application to reopen its case on Notice of Motion for a pseudonym order - T5007
Farmer v Residential Tenancies Tribunal & 2 Ors
[2000] NSWSC 199Marsden v Amalgamated Television Services Pty Limited
[2000] NSWSC 235On defendant's Notice of Motion of 14 March 2000 for use of a pseudonym and on waiver of privilege: T4993
Regina v Hill
[2000] NSWSC 259Murder - Maliciously discharging a firearm with intent to do grievious bodily harm - Sentence