Cases and authorities
Search and browse the full text of NSW Supreme Court judgments ingested into BriefBridge. Click a result to read the judgment, or ask a research question in chat.
William John Jeffries v Indigenous Land Corporation
[2015] NSWSC 1616EQUITY - Directors indemnity interpretation - Whether indemnity only commences when proceedings are actually commenced - Whether directors have established no other source of indemnity - Whether a finding in favour of director in proceedings required before indemnity can be called on
Secretary, Department of Social Services & Commonwealth of Australia v Francesco Cassaniti and Maria Cassaniti
[2015] NSWSC 1586CIVIL PROCEDURE – application for declaratory relief by non-party to proceedings – whether Court has jurisdiction to grant declarations in favour of non-party – whether non-party has right to joinder in proceedings for the purpose of seeking declarations – whether the Supreme Court of New South Wales has jurisdiction to make declarations as to what matters will be binding on the AAT – discretionary factors relevant to making of declarations
Samadi Developments Pty Limited v SX Projects Pty Limited
[2015] NSWSC 1576PROCEDURE – judgments and orders – in general – application for stay of proceedings – where defendant has obtained judgment against plaintiff regarding progress payments pursuant to adjudication determination – where plaintiff has offsetting claim within the meaning of Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) s 459H – whether failing to grant a stay of proceedings until judgment debt is paid would be contrary to the policy of the Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Act 1999 (NSW) PROCEDURE – costs – security for costs – quantum – reasonability of costs estimates
Reznitsky v Director of Public Prosecutions
[2015] NSWCA 338JUDICIAL REVIEW – application to set aside judgment in District Court – applicant failed to appear on appeal from Local Court – appeal dismissed – application to set aside order dismissing appeal – applicant failed to attend on second day of hearing and failed to proffer evidence in support of application – review sought of order dismissing application to reinstate appeal – whether jurisdictional error – whether reasonable apprehension of bias – whether procedural unfairness – whether failure to give reasons
Bank of Queensland v Awad
[2015] NSWSC 1579PROCEDURE – civil – interlocutory issues – application to vacate hearing date – where defendant requires spinal surgery
Adoption of NV
[2015] NSWSC 2146FAMILY LAW AND CHILD WELFARE – parental responsibility – application for consent dispense order in respect of birth father – where birth father cannot, after reasonable inquiries, be found or identified – no requirement to serve application for consent dispense order on birth father – where in best interests of child to make dispense consent order – continuation of interim parental responsibility order.
In the matter of Ice TV Pty Limited (administrators appointed)
[2015] NSWSC 2006CORPORATIONS – Insolvency – Notice of creditor’s meeting – where the administrators of a company sought orders permitting notice of a meeting of creditors, and documents for the purpose of that meeting, to be sent to creditors by email – application of s 447A of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth).
R v A2; R v KM; R v Vaziri (No. 17)
[2015] NSWSC 1601CRIMINAL LAW - jury trial - juror experiencing persistent illness - whether juror should be discharged - s.53B(a) and (d) Jury Act 1977 applied - juror discharged - whether trial to continue with jury of 11 - s.53C applied - order that trial continue with jury of 11
Re MF Global Australia Ltd (in liq); Hopper v Campbell in his capacity as liquidator of MF Global Australia Ltd (in liq)
[2015] NSWSC 1583PROCEDURE – Costs – Order for costs on indemnity basis – Where Calderbank offer was rejected by unsuccessful Plaintiff – Whether it was unreasonable for the Plaintiff to reject the offer.
Alleron Investment Management Ltd v Shek
[2015] NSWSC 1582PROCEDURE – interlocutory orders – ex parte application – freezing and substituted service orders
Sharp v Attorney General of NSW
[2015] NSWSC 1580EQUITY – trusts and trustees – charitable trusts – whether trust created in will a valid charitable trust – application for judicial advice as to proper construction of will and ambit of trustee’s powers
In the matter of Hair Industrie Penrith Pty Ltd, Hair Industrie Merrylands Pty Ltd
[2015] NSWSC 1578CONTRACTS – general contractual principles – where contracts for acquisition of shares by the Plaintiff and her appointment as a director of two companies – where Defendants allegedly breached the contracts – where Defendants did not lead any evidence – where limited evidence as to quantification of damages – whether damages established – whether restitution for total failure of consideration.
State of New South Wales v Plum
[2015] NSWSC 1566CIVIL PROCEDURE – application to transfer proceedings from District Court to Supreme Court – whether there is sufficient reason to transfer – whether there are complex issues to be determined – complexity of determining whether police officers owed a duty of care to plaintiff during arrest and detention in police vehicle - whether the proceedings involve issues of public importance
Kern v Qantas Airways Limited
[2015] NSWSC 1565CIVIL PROCEDURE – application for summary dismissal – whether claim statute barred pursuant to s 9B of the Civil Aviation (Carriers’ Liability) Act 1959 (Cth) and Article 35 of the Montreal Convention 1999 – wrong defendant named – whether pleadings disclose a reasonable cause of action, are embarrassing or are an abuse of process
Carolan v Fairfax Media Publications Pty Ltd (No 5)
[2015] NSWSC 1560DEFAMATION – defences – application on first day of trial to amend particulars of truth defence – where plaintiff claiming prejudice – whether proof required – whether defendants should be permitted to call the plaintiff to disprove the alleged prejudice – whether prejudice manifest
CBX2 Pty Ltd v National Australia Bank Limited (No 3)
[2015] NSWSC 1555SECURITY FOR COSTS - threshold issue – relevant considerations under UCPR 42.21(1A) – stultification – whether those standing behind the company are also without means to satisfy an adverse costs order – whether there has been full and frank disclosure of assets and liabilities – whether the plaintiff’s impecuniosity was caused by the defendant’s actions
Forgall Pty Ltd v Greater Taree City Council
[2015] NSWCA 340APPEAL – civil – application for leave – decision of judge of Land and Environment Court on appeal from decision of Commissioner in Class 1 jurisdiction – whether arguable error – whether issue of principle – whether procedural unfairness – whether detailed landscape plan required – whether “concession” by Council that plan could form part of conditions of consent PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENT – development prohibited unless consistent with objectives of zone – onus on applicant to satisfy Court that condition complied with – preparation of draft conditions if consent forthcoming
QBE Insurance (Australia) Ltd v Australian Broadcasting Commission
[2015] NSWSC 1585CIVIL – urgent injunction to prevent broadcast of story on ABC’s 7:30 Report – where VCAT proceedings are commencing the following day between Ms Ingram, the subject of the story and QBE – whether broadcast will effect fairness of hearing – whether broadcast a contempt of court by Ms Ingram CIVIL – jurisdiction – interim injunction – power of this Court to grant injunction with respect to proceedings in an interstate tribunal
Re Estate GR, deceased
[2015] NSWSC 1584SUCCESSION – Probate and letters of administration – Grants of probate and letters of administration – Jurisdiction and discretion of court – Controversy attaching to validity of final will – Passing over final will - Grant of probate in common form of penultimate will – Reservation of liberty to apply for revocation of grant – Time to make such application limited
Scott v Wondal
[2015] NSWSC 1577REAL PROPERTY – possession of land – defendant made bankrupt – defendant remains in possession of land owned by her – action by Trustee in bankruptcy for possession of land – no standing by defendant to oppose orders – no defence to Trustee’s claim
R v Xi
[2015] NSWSC 1575CRIMINAL LAW – release application – bail conditions – large commercial supply of methylamphetamine – applicant required to show cause – severely disabled son – whether necessary to bring disabled child in the court room – illness of applicant’s parents required to care for child – show cause requirement satisfied – risk of flight – substantial cash security available – electronic monitoring – not available as a pre-release requirement – otherwise not prohibited by statute – conditions capable of mitigating risk of flight
Croucher v Cachia
[2015] NSWCA 365PROCEDURE – judgments and orders – whether orders should be stayed pending appeal – whether applicant has arguable case – stay granted subject to conditions – undertakings to the Court
Benedict Industries Pty Ltd v Sutherland Shire Council
[2015] NSWCCA 272ENVIRONMENT AND PLANNING – environmental offences – appeal – challenge to validity of Tree and Bushland Preservation Order the subject of four criminal charges – whether Council purported to make the Order – whether the Order lawfully made by Council under relevant environmental planning instrument – whether, by purporting to prohibit certain conduct, the Order was outside the authority conferred on the Council by the planning instrument – whether the Order was impliedly repealed by the repeal of the relevant planning instrument by a later environmental planning instrument – appeal dismissed
Bobolas v Waverley Council (No 3)
[2015] NSWCA 336PROCEDURE – adjournment of appeal – application made at commencement of hearing of appeal – no written submissions filed by appellants – legal aid sought but unavailable
Schultz v McCormack
[2015] NSWCA 330TORTS – negligence – duty of care – breach of duty – occupier’s liability – plaintiff slipped on wet tiled surface at night after rain – whether primary judge erred in characterising risk – whether primary judge erred in finding occupiers not negligent – whether primary judge erred in finding of contributory negligence TORTS – negligence – duty of care – whether risk of harm that materialised an “obvious risk” within Civil Liability Act 2002 (NSW), s 5F(1) such that occupier did not owe plaintiff duty of care to warn of it TORTS – negligence – damages – whether primary judge erred in assessment of domestic assistance claim
Fairfax Media Publications v Zeccola
[2015] NSWCA 329TORTS – defamation – defence of contextual truth – s 26, Defamation Act 2005 (NSW) – plaintiffs pleaded imputations of not returning profits, withholding returns and dishonouring distribution commitments –defendants pleaded contextual imputations of general financial default – whether contextual imputations must differ from plaintiff’s imputations in kind as well as in substance – whether “differ in substance test” is a sufficient exposition of s 26 – whether defendants’ imputations capable of being “other imputations” carried “in addition to” appellants’ imputations TORTS – defamation – defence of contextual truth under s 26, Defamation Act 2005 (NSW) – whether imputation capable of being carried – imputation of “reasonable suspicion” – holder of “reasonable suspicion” not identified – matters complained of did not refer to any person or authority holding “reasonable suspicion” TORTS – defamation – practice and procedure – whether appropriate to strike out contextual imputations prior to trial
Daniel Terry Behman v Tarek Behman (also known as Terry Behman)
[2015] NSWSC 1787EQUITY - Claim for beneficial interest in property pursuant to constructive trust - plaintiff’s claim arose as a result of having lived with the defendant in a father/son relationship where the plaintiff made extensive financial contributions to the family home - Funds provided by plaintiff used to pay the mortgage and or assist the defendant to pay the mortgage - Whether common intention that plaintiff had beneficial interest in property - Whether unconscionable for the defendant to retain full beneficial ownership of property - Equitable proprietary estoppel claim
In the matter of Aspen Group Limited; Aspen Funds Management Limited in its capacity as responsible entity of Aspen Property Trust; Aspen Parks Property Management Ltd and Aspen Funds Management Limited in its capacity as responsible entity of Aspen Parks Property Trust
[2015] NSWSC 1718CORPORATIONS – Schemes of arrangement – Application under s 411 Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) for orders convening a meeting of members to consider proposed schemes of arrangement and for approval of the proposed schemes of arrangement – where schemes of arrangement involved the merger of businesses operated by the four Plaintiffs – where merger involves the responsible entity for two trusts – whether to convene meeting of the members – judicial advice sought by responsible entities pursuant to Trustee Act 1925 (NSW) s 63.
AB v Curry & Anor (No. 3)
[2015] NSWSC 1677PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – suppression and non-publication orders – redaction of Court’s published reasons for decision – identification of complainant in sexual abuse offence proceedings – plaintiff had adduced evidence relating to her physical and sexual abuse while in foster care in support of her family provision application – no suppression or non-publication orders were sought at trial – plaintiff sought removal or redaction of Court’s reasons after they had been published – reasons identified the plaintiff and the circumstances surrounding her foster care, but not the alleged offender – where police are investigating the plaintiff’s allegations of abuse, but no criminal proceedings have been commenced – where defendants’ counsel published a copy of the Court’s reasons on his website – whether it is necessary to remove or redact the Court’s reasons in order to prevent prejudice to the proper administration of justice – consideration of principles of open justice – consideration of the policy underlying s 578A of the Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) in relation to publication of information identifying complainants in sexual abuse offence proceedings – held, allowing the application in part and ordering the removal of the Court’s reasons and their replacement with redacted reasons, that while s 578A does not apply, the policy underlying that section informs what is necessary for the proper administration of justice
APX Projects Pty Limited v The Owners – Strata Plan No. 64025 (No. 2)
[2015] NSWSC 1572COSTS – application for indemnity costs – Calderbank letter – whether proposal contained a real and genuine element of compromise – late amendment to pleading – whether late amendment caused defendant any disadvantage – cost consequences of unjustifiable failure to bring proceedings under Strata Schemes Management Act 1996 (NSW)
Wayne Danckert v Ralph Erwin Tonkin
[2015] NSWSC 1570CONTRACTS – existence of a binding agreement – intention of parties to be bound – language of proposal – context of the agreement – history of formal documentation – subsequent conduct of parties EQUITY – estoppel – whether representations made – whether representations relied upon – reasonableness of reliance – whether representations relied upon to the detriment of a party CONSUMER LAW – misleading or deceptive conduct – whether representations were made – whether representations were misleading or deceptive
Frewin v Adecco Industrial Pty Limited
[2015] NSWSC 1568CONTRACT – whether contract for indemnity remained in force and binding on parties after expiry of agreement – whether conduct of parties such that they ought be taken to have extended agreement after expiry and ought be bound by terms – whether sufficient evidence to conclude that performance of the arrangement between the parties continued in the same way following expiry of agreement – lack of evidence CONTRACT – construction of indemnity clause – context to be determined as at date of contract – indemnities to be construed against the indemnified CONTRACT – power of courts to make informal rectification of documents that contain obvious errors
DHR International, Inc a company incorporated in Delaware in the United States of America v Challis
[2015] NSWSC 1567PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – interlocutory injunctions – application to compel defendant to prevent access to internet blog posts, and to restrain defendant from publishing injurious falsehoods – consideration of undesirability of framing injunctions in terms of the elements of the tort TORTS – injurious falsehood – elements of the tort – relevance of the principle of free speech to interlocutory injunction to restrain injurious falsehoods – held, refusing the application, that insufficient evidence was adduced to establish a serious question to be tried as to the falsity of the statements TRADE PRACTICES – misleading or deceptive conduct – application for interlocutory injunction – held, refusing the application, that insufficient evidence was adduced to establish a serious question to be tried as to the representations being misleading or deceptive, or as to their being made in trade or commerce
R v Brewer (No. 2)
[2015] NSWSC 1547CRIMINAL LAW – Offences – Murder – Where accused charged with murder – Where psychiatrists qualified on behalf of the Crown and the accused each expressed the view that a defence of mental illness was available – Accused found not guilty on the grounds of mental illness PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – Legal practitioners – Duties and responsibilities of counsel – Where medical evidence established the availability of a defence of mental illness – Where the accused asserted in evidence that he was not mentally ill – Where the accused had instructed his Counsel not to pursue a defence of mental illness – Where defence was raised on the evidence – Responsibility of the Court to consider the issue
Bobolas v Waverley Council (No 4)
[2015] NSWCA 337LOCAL GOVERNMENT - enforcement of order to remove waste - whether order invalid - whether order served - whether denial of procedural fairness - no error shown - Local Government Act 1993 (NSW) s 678 PRACTICE - appeal - adjournment - application for further adjournment refused where history of noncompliance with court directions and application unsupported by evidence
In the matter of FAI Leasing Finance Pty Limited (in liquidation); In the matter of FAI Home Security Holdings Pty Limited (in liquidation)
[2015] NSWSC 2150CORPORATIONS – winding up – liquidators – approval of liquidators’ remuneration – whether remuneration sought is reasonable – court-ordered winding up – requirement that remuneration is approved by creditors at creditors’ meeting – where no external creditors – (CTH) Corporations Act 2001, s 1322 – declaration that failure to hold meeting does not invalidate remuneration – destruction of books and records – where ASIC does not oppose destruction.
R v Maybir (No 4)
[2015] NSWSC 1739CRIMINAL LAW – evidence – admissibility of certain questions and answers in accused’s police interview that reveal accused made deceased eat his own excrement – s 137 Evidence Act – whether probative value outweighed by danger of unfair prejudice – evidence of accused’s state of mind – where evidence has significant probative value – evidence admissible
R v Maybir (No 3)
[2015] NSWSC 1738CRIMINAL LAW – evidence – application for a view – s 53 Evidence Act – unopposed by defence – where accused does not wish to be present – where alternations to premises can be sufficiently explained to the jury – application granted
Walkabout II Pty Ltd v Jabulani Pty Ltd and Ors
[2015] NSWSC 1569PARTNERSHIP –Partnership property – Dealings with partnership property - Appointment of receivers - Adoption of receivers’ reports –Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 NSW rule 20.24
Sheedy v State Asphalt Services Pty Ltd
[2015] NSWSC 1532Practice & Procedure - transfer from District Court to Supreme Court – re-transfer impossible and abuse of process
Newman v Newman
[2015] NSWSC 1207PRACTICE & PROCEDURE – Application made by Plaintiff for adjournment and to re-open the case – Application to re-open made prior to conclusion of hearing, after evidence read and cross-examination concluded – Leave granted to re-open the case – Adjournment not granted SUCCESSION – FAMILY PROVISION – The Plaintiff, an adult child of the deceased, applies for a family provision order under Chapter 3 of the Succession Act 2006 – The Defendant is also an adult child of the deceased and brother of the Plaintiff – Deceased left Will giving Plaintiff a weekly benefit of $250 for his life and left the residue of her estate to the Defendant – Reasonably large estate – Whether adequate and proper provision not made in Will of the deceased for the Plaintiff and if so the nature and quantum of the provision to be made
Organic Paradise Pty Ltd v Brett Smith; Just Organics (Aust) Pty Ltd v Peter Melov
[2015] NSWSC 1788EQUITY - Whether shares were held in trust - Whether directors breached fiduciary duties owed to company - Remedy available to company against director in relation to transfer of business to another entity controlled by director for no consideration - Claim of trespass and conversion of goods
Director-General, Department of Family & Community Services; Re CDM
[2015] NSWSC 1573ADOPTION - Child over 18 years - Adoption Act 2000 (NSW) - Section 101(1)(a) - Whether with child's consent the court can change the child’s name in making an adoption order
Vicky Romano v Anthony Romano; Filomina Kyriacou v Anthony Romano
[2015] NSWSC 1571PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – Hearing vacated due to illness of plaintiff – No issue of principle
R v Khalid
[2015] NSWSC 1561CRIMINAL LAW – Practice and procedure – Application to vacate trial – Application based upon service by the Crown of voluminous material by way of disclosure – Where concession made by the Crown that the material was served at a stage which would not give the accused’s representatives a proper opportunity to consider its content and obtain instructions – Trial vacated
Hardwick v Federal Commissioner of Taxation & Anor
[2015] NSWSC 1557SUMMARY DISMISSAL – plaintiff prosecuted in Local Court for failing to lodge tax returns – commences proceedings in Supreme Court – alleges s 8C of Taxation Administration Act 1953 unconstitutional – alleges no power to require tax return on “approved form” from plaintiff as information would be provided to child support registrar – jurisdiction – whether Supreme Court can entertain claim that s 8C unconstitutional – whether Court can consider application for writ against Commonwealth officer in relation to prosecution pending in State Court – cross-vesting jurisdiction in relation to writ against federal officer – “special federal matter” – whether “special reasons” for not transferring proceedings to Federal Court – proceedings frivolous and Federal Court should not be burdened – whether constitutional guarantee of freedom of contract – whether s 8C of Taxation Administration Act unconstitutional – whether plaintiff had right to his own approved form of tax return – all claims untenable – proceedings dismissed.
Aboriginal Housing Company Ltd v Kaye-Engel (No 7)
[2015] NSWSC 1554CIVIL LAW – final orders – matter remitted to NCAT – defendant to pay plaintiff’s costs
Hamilton v State of New South Wales
[2015] NSWSC 1430CLIENT LEGAL PRIVILEGE – misfeasance in public office claim - privilege claimed by the Director of Public Prosecutions – dominant purpose test – whether obligation of confidentiality existed – whether privilege waived – documents knowingly and voluntarily disclosed to Crown Solicitor – whether joint clients – whether common interest existed – considerations of fairness
Allianz Australia Insurance Ltd v Rutland
[2015] NSWCA 328ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – judicial review – medical assessment under Motor Accidents Compensation Act 1999 (NSW), Ch 3, Pt 3.4 – statutory task of Review Panel under s 63(3A) – whether Review Panel failed to undertake a new assessment of matters concerned – whether Review Panel limited its assessment to asserted errors of original assessor – whether denial of procedural fairness where respondent not given opportunity to address Review Panel on conflicting evidence from which an inference adverse to her was drawn
Magjarraj v Firth
[2015] NSWCA 326PROFESSIONAL NEGLIGENCE – legal practitioners – whether elements of negligence established – whether any loss suffered