Section 152BDCA — Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth)

Final migration plan prevails over inconsistent binding rules of conduct

If a final migration plan is in force and imposes obligations or prohibitions on a designated Telstra successor company, binding rules of conduct have no effect to the extent to which they would have the effect of:

(a) preventing the designated Telstra successor company from complying with the final migration plan; or

(b) requiring the designated Telstra successor company to engage in conduct in connection with matters covered by the final migration plan.

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 22 May 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au. Verify the current text against the official source before relying on it.

Related sections

s 152BDA — Restrictions on binding rules of conduct
s 152BDB — Access agreements prevail over inconsistent binding rules of conduct
s 152BDC — Duration of binding rules of conduct
s 152BDCB — Statutory infrastructure provider standards and rules prevail over inconsistent binding rules of conduct
s 152BDD — Commission must give copy of binding rules of conduct to carrier etc.
s 152BDE — Access determinations that are inconsistent with binding rules of conduct

Research how courts apply s 152BDCA

BriefBridge searches Australian caselaw by meaning — every answer cited to the paragraph.

Try BriefBridge free