Exemption for digital intermediaries providing caching, conduit or storage services
(1) A digital intermediary is not liable for defamation for the publication of digital matter if the intermediary proves— (a) the matter was published using 1 or more of the following services provided by the intermediary— (i) a caching service, (ii) a conduit service, (iii) a storage service, and (b) the intermediary’s role in the publication was limited to providing 1 or more of the services mentioned in paragraph (a), and (c) the intermediary did not do any of the following— (i) initiate the steps required to publish the matter, (ii) select any of the recipients of the matter, (iii) encourage the poster of the matter to publish the matter, (iv) edit the content of the matter, whether before or after it was published, (v) promote the matter, whether before or after it was published. (2) Subsection (1)(c) does not apply in relation to action taken because it is required by or under a law of an Australian jurisdiction or an order of an Australian court or Australian tribunal. (3) Subsection (1) applies regardless of whether the digital intermediary knew, or ought reasonably to have known, the digital matter was defamatory.
Sourced from the New South Wales Legislation website at 8 June 2026. For the latest information on New South Wales Government legislation please go to https://www.legislation.nsw.gov.au. Verify the current text against the official source before relying on it.
BriefBridge searches NSW and High Court caselaw by meaning — every answer cited to the paragraph.
Try BriefBridge free