Section 22 — Defamation Act 2005 (NSW)

(1) This section applies to defamation proceedings that are tried by jury.
(2) The jury is to determine whether the defendant has published defamatory matter about the plaintiff and, if so, whether any defence raised by the defendant has been established.
(3) If the jury finds that the defendant has published defamatory matter about the plaintiff and that no defence has been established, the judicial officer and not the jury is to determine the amount of damages (if any) that should be awarded to the plaintiff and all unresolved issues of fact and law relating to the determination of that amount.
(4) If the proceedings relate to more than one cause of action for defamation, the jury must give a single verdict in relation to all causes of action on which the plaintiff relies unless the judicial officer orders otherwise.
(5) Nothing in this section—
(a) affects any law or practice relating to special verdicts, or
(b) requires or permits a jury to determine any issue that, at general law, is an issue to be determined by the judicial officer, or
(c) requires or permits a jury to determine any issue that another provision of this Act requires a judicial officer to determine.

Related sections

• s 19 — Inadmissibility of evidence of certain statements and admissions
• s 20 — Effect of apology on liability for defamation
• s 21 — Election for defamation proceedings to be tried by jury
• s 23 — Leave required for multiple proceedings in relation to publication of same defamatory matter
• s 23A — Orders for preliminary discovery about posters of digital matter
• s 24 — Scope of defences under general law and other law not limited

Research how courts apply s 22

BriefBridge searches NSW and High Court caselaw by meaning — every answer cited to the paragraph.