Exclusion of acts of terrorism from claims against Nominal Defendant
(cf s 35A MACA) (1) There is no right of action against the Nominal Defendant under section 2.29, 2.30 or 2.32 for damages that are attributable to an act that, having regard to the nature of the act and the context in which the act was done, it is reasonable to characterise as an act of terrorism. (2) An act cannot be characterised as an act of terrorism for the purposes of this section unless it can be so characterised under section 2.10 (2). (3) This section is repealed on a date to be appointed by proclamation for the purposes of this section.
Sourced from the New South Wales Legislation website at 9 June 2026. For the latest information on New South Wales Government legislation please go to https://www.legislation.nsw.gov.au. Verify the current text against the official source before relying on it.
BriefBridge searches NSW and High Court caselaw by meaning — every answer cited to the paragraph.
Try BriefBridge free